消息

匿名的照片

评论:

美国正试图将金钱提取,损害国外竞争对手的美国汽车制造商。他们处理问题的方式与他们如何处理的方式与许多情况不同,当时美国汽车和卡车制造商在围绕法规欺骗其途径,并且它根本没有针对减少整体排放。我们到目前为止,我们迄今为止的每一步都是最大限度地提高了大众的损害,即使以迅速解决问题的成本也是如此。

They knew they could hit a German company where it hurts by damaging its reputation on environmental issues, so they purpusefully exaggerated claims (e.g. only mentioning the most extreme values measured for a very short timespan during a regeneration cycle, rather than the average), implied that the emissions are much higher than for comparable cars (they are not) and completely ignored the fact that the cars in question have much lower emissions than US standards allow for all other pollutants.

这并没有借口汽车制造商在寻找这种行为的证据时欺骗其围绕法规或其他国家的方式,但事实是美国应该在类似的情况下同样地对待每家公司,并且他们应该在一个方面做出反应比例和合理的方式。这样,问题可能会迟早,为实践中最低的NOx排放的柴油汽车的声誉造成的损坏将受到限制,而美国大众柴油车主不必处理以外的任何东西召回。

所有这一切都很好地引起了对实践排放问题的关注,但结果完全适得其反。媒体和政治中的责任集中了:
- 在一个公司(具有讽刺意味的是,制造汽车在实践中产生最低排放的汽车)
- 在一种类型的排放(NOx)上,但不是更危险的颗粒或挥发性有机化合物
- 在技术(柴油)上,可能更难以优化低NOX排放,但可以比其他排放中最常见的替代品更清洁,并且对Globar警告造成更大的贡献。

这一切都不会导致机动车总体损害较低的较低水平。它主要是美国经济利益。

介绍RDE测试是朝着实际提高空气质量的非常好的一步。
Furthermore, I would argue that it would be better if emission limits would be the same for every engine type, but do allow for tradeoffs (e.g., a little more NOx is allowed if it leads to lower PM, or the other way around), with correspondence factors backed by studies that analyse environmental and health effects of various pollutants. Finally, I would propose that increasing overall emissions in any way to protect engine components, should only be allowed if there is no technical feasible way of protecting it without these measures.